Policy Home

Other Resources

Annual Reports Strategy
PME
Budget
Counterdrug
   Blueprint

Fact Sheets and    Circulars

ONDCP Web Site About ONDCP News and Public Affairs Policy Drug Facts Publications Related Links
Prevention Treatment Science and Technology Enforcement State and Local International Funding
Start of Main Content

National Drug Control Strategy
Update 2003

February 2003

Table 69. Percentage 1 of Adult Female Booked Arrestees Who Used Methamphetamine, by Location, 1991–2001

Location Year
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2 2001
Albany (Capital Area) 0.0 0.0
Albuquerque 2.4 8.9 5.7 4.6
Anchorage 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.0
Atlanta 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.0
Birmingham 0.3 0.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.9 2.2
Charlotte 0.0
Chicago 0.0 0.0 0.3
Cleveland 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2
Dallas 1.5 2.7 3.3 3.3 3.7 2.8 4.0 3.2 3.0
Denver 1.7 1.4 2.1 2.1 3.2 4.6 4.6 2.4 5.3 4.3
Des Moines 24.2 22.4 20.5 27.5
Detroit 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ft. Lauderdale 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Honolulu 47.2 36.1
Houston 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.9 0.5 0.0 0.1 1.7
Indianapolis 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.7
Laredo 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Las Vegas 24.3 17.9 20.5 15.5
Los Angeles 6.8 8.0 9.8 9.8 11.3 8.9 11.8 12.0 12.3
Minneapolis 0.0 2.5 0.0
New Orleans 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.0
New York City 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7
Oklahoma City 11.3 16.2 15.8
Omaha 2.7 2.7 10.3 13.3 13.6 11.1 13.2 10.3
Philadelphia 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.7 1.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
Phoenix 5.6 6.9 26.0 26.0 21.7 25.6 22.4 14.3 24.1 32.3
Portland, OR 11.5 7.3 21.4 21.4 19.7 20.7 22.3 24.8 23.5 20.4
Sacramento 29.2 32.4 29.6 42.6
St. Louis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 2.1 2.5
Salt Lake City 31.4 34.1 28.9 18.8
San Antonio 1.6 1.6 0.7 0.7 2.5 2.4 1.7 1.4
San Diego 24.9 25.5 53.0 53.0 40.2 42.2 33.3 36.3 28.7 37.4
San Jose 7.1 11.3 23.3 23.3 23.6 24.9 21.1 31.6 40.8 38.2
Seattle 5.2 9.5 21.7
Spokane 22.0 26.6 8.3
Tucson 2.5 9.6 9.0 12.4
Washington, D.C. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
— Data not available.
1 Percent positive by urinalysis, January through December of each year.
2 Data for 2000 are unweighted and not based on probability sampling.
3 Data prior to the third quarter of 1998 pertains to Manhattan only.
Sources: 1991–1996 data from Drug Use Forecasting (1991–1996); 1997–1998 data from Annual Report on Adult and Juvenile Arrestees (1997 and 1998); 1999 data from 1999 Annual Report on Drug Use Among Adult and Juvenile Arrestees, Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program (ADAM), National Institute of Justice (NIJ); 2000 data from 2000 Annualized Site Visit (2001); 2001 data from Drug Use and Related Matters Among Adult Arrestees, 2001, ADAM, NIJ.

Previous Contents Next



Last Updated: May 7, 2003