Table 63. Percentage1 of Juvenile Male Booked Arrestees Who Used Marijuana, by Location, 1994�2000
Location
|
1994
|
1995
|
1996
|
1997
|
1998
|
1999
|
2000
|
Birmingham
|
34
|
42
|
53
|
61
|
47
|
43
|
42
|
Cleveland
|
42
|
47
|
62
|
58
|
60
|
60
|
55
|
Denver
|
52
|
49
|
60
|
62
|
59
|
59
|
65
|
Indianapolis
|
26
|
33
|
43
|
39
|
47
|
�
|
�
|
Los Angeles
|
31
|
34
|
51
|
55
|
56
|
52
|
57
|
Phoenix
|
41
|
41
|
52
|
49
|
64
|
62
|
55
|
Portland
|
18
|
16
|
36
|
41
|
50
|
41
|
46
|
St. Louis
|
34
|
34
|
56
|
54
|
40
|
�
|
�
|
San Antonio
|
35
|
41
|
48
|
53
|
49
|
53
|
54
|
San Diego
|
33
|
48
|
48
|
53
|
49
|
53
|
44
|
San Jose
|
28
|
31
|
41
|
45
|
35
|
�
|
�
|
Tucson
|
�
|
�
|
�
|
�
|
48
|
53
|
52
|
Washington, DC
|
61
|
54
|
65
|
65
|
57
|
�
|
�
|
� Data not available.
1Percent positive by urinalysis, January through December of each year. Percentages are rounded.
Source: 1994�1996 data from Drug Use Forecasting (1994�1996); 1997�1999 data from Annual Report on Adult and Juvenile Arrestees (1997�1999), Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program (ADAM), National Institute of Justice (NIJ); 2000 data from 2000 Annualized Site Visit Reports, ADAM, NIJ (2001).
|